Western Reserve Health Education/neomed Program Family Medicine Residency

Yous know well-nigh how individuals gain control of the ability of the Land and so abuse that ability like onetime US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some Usa businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush-league Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Retrieve how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the U.s.a. with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you retrieve that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can salve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about equally a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather, specially diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself non to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

In that location was a nasty illness called smallpox and information technology did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's kickoff park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Earth.

The center and upper classes needed to exist reassured the Country would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed equally many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, UK, Us, Sweden.

Now y'all can read a relatively curt just well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- UK, U.s. & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, equally the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the refuse in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Urban center of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the U.k. and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox expiry rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's arroyo likewise cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Ground forces (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.ane
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Thou Totals and case fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.i

Biggs said "In this comparing, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist linguistic communication, may I enquire, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding outcome—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Minor-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-scale-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	three,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.ten	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Medico

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching influenza season and the enthusiastic calls to employ the influenza vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavor to provide protection against contagious affliction brainstorm?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country medico and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was oft called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year quondam boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but cipher more than. Afterwards, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-diddled, admitting mild, case of the affliction. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" take been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using modest amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western earth by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was merely a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The thought behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practise meliorate against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically skillful. Just because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[iii] The procedure did frequently assist protect the private that was inoculated, only there was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[iv,5] Even so, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Just, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could information technology accept had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had amend admission to more than nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

In that location was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years subsequently, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative process it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox as a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection confronting smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Doctor-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his do.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could accept told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the outset there were problems with Jenner'southward process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report just decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to encompass Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were yet dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the yr 1799. A month subsequently it was inoculated with small-scale-pox matter without upshot, and a few months subsequently took confluent modest-pox and died. 2. A adult female-retainer to Mr. Take a chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental mode from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. 3 and iv. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'south office . . . died of minor-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was not living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the aforementioned fatality charge per unit equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the most proficient practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Dark-brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." But afterwards vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His feel was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace it equally a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a md to have spoken out against it every bit Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could besides be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a nifty hubbub about the small-pox. Information technology broke out with the not bad epidemic to the due north . . . Information technology pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had pocket-size-pox earlier, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some alone, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote nigh the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical exercise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the existent small-scale-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine textile was the "humanized" form, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but equally failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authorization, and at that place were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[xvi]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine textile came from cows, Jenner really believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new disease.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A afterwards inquiry adamant that this was nothing more than the erstwhile exercise of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not simply was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were likewise reports of deaths from other causes shortly afterward vaccination. For instance, a peel condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful style to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; i cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "pocket-sized-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two expert cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas afterwards vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Only facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practise this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zilch to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the not bad 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no upshot at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this indicate, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were fabricated that vaccination made smallpox less likely to impale or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent doc of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the strength of police force created the perfect surroundings that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A peachy pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were twenty-three m four hundred and lx-nine cases of small-pox in that ground forces. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:

Of nine chiliad three hundred and ninety-2 small-pox patients in London hospitals, six m eight hundred and fifty-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than than one hundred and twenty-2 thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Deutschland show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-scale-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine rubber, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same twelvemonth Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the apply of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Nevertheless, there were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would upshot in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town'due south residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph two). Leicester showed that past abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Here is a peachy manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated past a crucial exam of an feel extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less afflicted past that disease since information technology abased vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safe process, it frequently caused sickness or even decease. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph iv).

Graph two: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph three: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. Later the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed one in v of its victims to ane that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to every bit low every bit 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, merely having become so much milder, information technology was oftentimes mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the Southward and afterwards gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very low and information technology [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for craven pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around 20%, as it had been historically. The tabular array also showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of babyhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor catching disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because information technology oft gives ascent to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the affliction is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, at that place was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major result, the do of smallpox vaccination continued from the fourth dimension of the terminal smallpox expiry in the United States in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated v,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now beingness termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in xx,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of four to 40%.[35] Even so, they acknowledged that nearly cases were not reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were as well an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had just been i smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox decease in the The states following an importation occurred in 1948, merely since that time there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is withal occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed services father after the father was vaccinated. Later a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was plant all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been fifty-fifty higher. This study but examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod wellness-intendance organisation, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays across the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has at present hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put united states of america in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the full general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted mode to deal with affliction, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a multifariousness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. 1000. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the employ of Acerb acid in blood-red fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" equally applied to pocket-size pox. Dr. Roth kickoff claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more reliable as a rubber in pocket-size-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the condom treatment died, while amongst those under ordinary treatment the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar'south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar every bit a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or 4 times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the nifty men who for a century past take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he volition take two or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or iv times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but only because almost people have been conditioned to accept the age-one-time prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of good for you collagen. Collagen is the poly peptide that forms connective tissue in pare, basic, and blood vessels and too gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is non able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, every bit a issue, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'due south College, described the poor nutrition of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amid the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, equally living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sunday, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the about intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gilded Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died every bit a outcome of their wounds deemed only for i percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (likewise known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping coughing mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half-dozen: England and Wales measles bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the globe from the devastation of smallpox is a central medical conventionalities that continues to exist echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine organized religion. But the true history shows us a unlike reality.

The brand proper noun of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an affliction. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is zip close to the myth.

Other extremely constructive alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. At present that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a expert idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be institute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Dr., Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Starting time Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of N-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half-dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford Academy Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Mag and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'due south Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present Country of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. four, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Written report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Midweek, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, Feb 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-scale-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Lookout, Apr 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Thousand. W. Harman, Doctor, "A Dr.'s Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Md, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not past the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "How Small-scale-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. Iii, no. xvi, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Communicable diseases as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. ii, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Toll Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Medico and Howard A. Joos Medico, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Correct to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fob, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acerb Acrid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Foreclose Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Vi, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Male monarch'due south College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Study of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Condom, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

robertsfrasmils54.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post